On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>
> I am working on a new compilation mode for what I call xbpf, which is
> basically eBPF plus extensions to eliminate the current restrictions to
> C. The purpose of -mxbpf is mainly to test the compiler. Once the
> support is in, I will
Hi Mike.
Thanks for the review.
On Aug 29, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Jose E. Marchesi
wrote:
>
> This patch adds a new dg_require_effective_target procedure to the
> testsuite infrastructure: indirect_calls. This new function tells
> whether a target supports calls to
On Aug 29, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>
> This patch adds a new dg_require_effective_target procedure to the
> testsuite infrastructure: indirect_calls. This new function tells
> whether a target supports calls to non-constant call targets.
Ok. I'll let people contemplate some
This patch adds a new dg_require_effective_target procedure to the
testsuite infrastructure: indirect_calls. This new function tells
whether a target supports calls to non-constant call targets.
This patch also annotates the tests in the gcc.c-torture testuite that
This patch adds a new dg_require_effective_target procedure to the
testsuite infrastructure: indirect_calls. This new function tells
whether a target supports calls to non-constant call targets.
This patch also annotates the tests in the gcc.c-torture testuite that
require support for indirect
