Hello Uroš,
On 15 Aug 20:29, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Can you avoid insn constraints like:
+ TARGET_AVX512DQ (MODE_SIZE == 64 || TARGET_AVX512VL)
This should be split to two insn patterns, each with different
baseline insn constraint.
I've splitted pattern into two similar w/ different mode
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Uroš,
On 15 Aug 20:29, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Can you avoid insn constraints like:
+ TARGET_AVX512DQ (MODE_SIZE == 64 || TARGET_AVX512VL)
This should be split to two insn patterns, each with different
Hello,
This patch introduces new patterns to support
AVX-512Vl,DQ broadcast insns.
Bootstrapped.
New tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI4F_BRCST32x2): New.
(define_mode_attr
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch introduces new patterns to support
AVX-512Vl,DQ broadcast insns.
Bootstrapped.
New tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md