On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 12:29, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
>> wrote:
>>> On 21 September 2015 at 10:18, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
input_location is set from the call stmt:
>>>
On 21 September 2015 at 12:29, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>> On 21 September 2015 at 10:18, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> input_location is set from the call stmt:
>>>
>>> /* FIXME: instantiate_decl isn't called by inlinable_function_p
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:29:36PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
> > On 21 September 2015 at 10:18, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >> input_location is set from the call stmt:
> >>
> >> /* FIXME: instantiate_decl isn't called by inlin
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 12:29, Richard Biener
> wrote:
least note the function we are failing to inline to (thus, use
DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION
of cfun->decl). So better add a diag_location and compute that upfront to
On 21 September 2015 at 12:29, Richard Biener
wrote:
>>> least note the function we are failing to inline to (thus, use
>>> DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION
>>> of cfun->decl). So better add a diag_location and compute that upfront to
>>> avoid
>>> repeating the check.
>>
>>error ("inlining failed i
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 10:18, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> input_location is set from the call stmt:
>>
>> /* FIXME: instantiate_decl isn't called by inlinable_function_p. */
>> saved_location = input_location;
>> input_location
On 21 September 2015 at 10:18, Richard Biener
wrote:
> input_location is set from the call stmt:
>
> /* FIXME: instantiate_decl isn't called by inlinable_function_p. */
> saved_location = input_location;
> input_location = gimple_location (stmt);
>
> it would be nice to get rid of that.
I
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> And now with the patch.
>
> On 18 September 2015 at 20:40, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>> In https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00300.html, we give a
>> "called from here" note without actually having a location, which lo
In https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00300.html, we give a
"called from here" note without actually having a location, which looks
strange. I haven't been able to generate such a testcase. In this patch, we
assert this cannot happen when checking and simply skip the extra note in
rele
And now with the patch.
On 18 September 2015 at 20:40, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> In https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00300.html, we give a
> "called from here" note without actually having a location, which looks
> strange. I haven't been able to generate such a testcase. In thi
10 matches
Mail list logo