On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 19:43, Ulrich Weigand via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:33:48PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > * doc/invoke.texi (-ffast-math): Remove mention of
> > > -fno-signaling-nans.
> > > Clarify conditions when __FAST_MATH__ preprocessor macro is defined.
Hi Ulrich,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:42:47PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> This did handle flag_excess_precision incorrectly, causing in particular
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97970
>
> I've reverted for now and will post a modified patch later.
> Sorry for the breakage!
>
>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:33:48PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > * doc/invoke.texi (-ffast-math): Remove mention of -fno-signaling-nans.
> > Clarify conditions when __FAST_MATH__ preprocessor macro is defined.
> >
> > * opts.c (common_handle_option): Pass OPTS_SET to set_fast_math_flags
>
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:57:32PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > It all makes sense, and is a nice improvement :-) But please mention it
> > in the release notes? No doubt people did use non-sensical flag
> > combinatio
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:57:32PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:33:48PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 2/11/20 11:43 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > > 1. If a component flag of -ffast-math (or -funsafe-math-optimizations)
> > >is explicitly set (or reset) on the co
Hi!
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:33:48PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 2/11/20 11:43 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > 1. If a component flag of -ffast-math (or -funsafe-math-optimizations)
> >is explicitly set (or reset) on the command line, this should override
> >any implicit change due to -f(n
On 2/11/20 11:43 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this second version of the patch incorporates all changes discussed
> in the original mail thread starting here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg02097.html
>
> The patch now implements the following set of changes:
>
> 1. If
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:43:31PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> 1. If a component flag of -ffast-math (or -funsafe-math-optimizations)
>is explicitly set (or reset) on the command line, this should override
>any implicit change due to -f(no-)fast-math, no matter in which order
>t
Hello,
this second version of the patch incorporates all changes discussed
in the original mail thread starting here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg02097.html
The patch now implements the following set of changes:
1. If a component flag of -ffast-math (or -funsafe-math-optimizati
