On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 09:53:46PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
> LGTM, thanks :)
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:43 PM Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
> > I see you have recently worked on lib/target-support.exp: could you do
> > the review of that part?
Generally, target specific additions to
Oh, one minor comment:
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-march=rv64gc_zbb" { target { lp64 &&
> riscv64*-*-* } } } */
{ target { rv64 } here
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-march=rv32gc_zbb" { target { ilp32 &&
> riscv64*-*-* } } } */
and { target { rv32 } here
That should make riscv32*-*-*
LGTM, thanks :)
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:43 PM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> +Jakub Jelinek
>
> Jakub,
>
> I see you have recently worked on lib/target-support.exp: could you do
> the review of that part?
>
> Thanks,
> Philipp.
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:36, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >
> > On
+Jakub Jelinek
Jakub,
I see you have recently worked on lib/target-support.exp: could you do
the review of that part?
Thanks,
Philipp.
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:36, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2022 11:33:34 PDT (-0700), philipp.toms...@vrull.eu wrote:
> > The Zbb support has
On Thu, 12 May 2022 11:33:34 PDT (-0700), philipp.toms...@vrull.eu wrote:
The Zbb support has introduced ctz and clz to the backend, but some
transformations in GCC need to know what the value of c[lt]z at zero
is. This affects how the optab is generated and may suppress use of
CLZ/CTZ in tree
The Zbb support has introduced ctz and clz to the backend, but some
transformations in GCC need to know what the value of c[lt]z at zero
is. This affects how the optab is generated and may suppress use of
CLZ/CTZ in tree passes.
Among other things, this is needed for the transformation of
