On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:45:00PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/8/21 7:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Yeah; it's worked pretty well for classes after we've dealt with the
> > initial fallout. I've factored the check into a new function, and also
> > extended it with the case where we'd crea
On 3/8/21 7:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:15:49PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 3/3/21 7:55 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this test we are building a call in a template, but since neither
the function nor any of its arguments are dependent, we go down the
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:15:49PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 3/3/21 7:55 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In this test we are building a call in a template, but since neither
> > the function nor any of its arguments are dependent, we go down the
> > normal path in finish_call_ex
