On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:08 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:04 PM Feng Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-11-28 11:06 Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > >On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:56 PM Feng Wang
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The link of PATCH v1:
> > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/gc
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:04 PM Feng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-28 11:06 Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:56 PM Feng Wang
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> The link of PATCH v1:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg326661.html
> >> This patch add another condition
On 2023-11-28 11:06 Andrew Pinski wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:56 PM Feng Wang wrote:
>>
>> The link of PATCH v1:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg326661.html
>> This patch add another condition for gimple-cond optimization. Refer to
>> the following test case.
>>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:56 PM Feng Wang wrote:
>
> The link of PATCH v1:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg326661.html
> This patch add another condition for gimple-cond optimization. Refer to
> the following test case.
> int foo1 (int data, int res)
> {
> res = data &
The link of PATCH v1:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg326661.html
This patch add another condition for gimple-cond optimization. Refer to
the following test case.
int foo1 (int data, int res)
{
res = data & 0xf;
res |= res << 4;
if (res < 0x22)
return 0x22;
retu
