On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> The problem is `!a?b:c` pattern will create a COND_EXPR with an 1bit signed
> integer
> which breaks patterns like `a?~t:t`. This rejects when we have a signed
> operand for
> both patterns.
>
> Note for GCC 15, I am going to look at the
The problem is `!a?b:c` pattern will create a COND_EXPR with an 1bit signed
integer
which breaks patterns like `a?~t:t`. This rejects when we have a signed operand
for
both patterns.
Note for GCC 15, I am going to look at the canonicalization of `a?~t:t` where t
was a constant since I think
