On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 15:48 -0800, Carl Love via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Segher, Pat:
>
> I have updated the patch to address the comments below.
>
> On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:30 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:34:51PM -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> > > On 11/24/20 8:17 PM
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 15:48 -0800, Carl Love via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Segher, Pat:
>
> I have updated the patch to address the comments below.
In all the excitement, i've lost track of some of the details throughout the
thread. :-)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rs6000, vector in
Segher, Pat:
I have updated the patch to address the comments below.
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:30 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:34:51PM -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> > On 11/24/20 8:17 PM, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > On 11/24/20 12:59 PM, Carl Love via Gcc-
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:34:51PM -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> On 11/24/20 8:17 PM, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 11/24/20 12:59 PM, Carl Love via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> +(define_insn "modu_"
> >> + [(set (match_operand:VIlong 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=v")
> >> + (umod:VIlong (match_o
On 11/24/20 8:17 PM, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 11/24/20 12:59 PM, Carl Love via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> +
>> +(define_insn "dives_"
>> + [(set (match_operand:VIlong 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=v")
>> +(unspec:VIlong [(match_operand:VIlong 1 "vsx_register_operand" "v")
>> +
On 11/24/20 12:59 PM, Carl Love via Gcc-patches wrote:
> +
> +(define_insn "dives_"
> + [(set (match_operand:VIlong 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=v")
> +(unspec:VIlong [(match_operand:VIlong 1 "vsx_register_operand" "v")
> + (match_operand:VIlong 2 "vsx_register_operand" "
Segher:
I have addressed the various issues you and Pat mentioned.
Specifically:
- Added parenthesis around the macro arguments in altivec.h.
- Removed VIlong_char, using instead.
- Reimplemented define_insn "vmulhs_" and define_insn
"vmulhs_" to not use an UNSPEC. Also changed the
