On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> - For int_128bit-runnable.c, I chose not to do gimple folding on the
> >> 128-bit
> >>comparison operations in the new implementation, because doing so
> >> results in
> >>bad code that splits things into two 64-bit
On 11/17/21 6:44 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:26:22PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi! I recently submitted [1] to make adjustments to test cases for the new
>> builtins
>> support, mostly due to error messages changing for consistency. Thanks for
>>
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:26:22PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! I recently submitted [1] to make adjustments to test cases for the new
> builtins
> support, mostly due to error messages changing for consistency. Thanks for
> the
> previous review. I've reviewed the reasons for the
Hi! I recently submitted [1] to make adjustments to test cases for the new
builtins
support, mostly due to error messages changing for consistency. Thanks for the
previous review. I've reviewed the reasons for the changes and removed
unrelated
changes as requested.
A couple of comments:
-
