Hi Bernd,
> On 1/8/21 8:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Hi, Bernd
>>
>> Thanks for investigating this and creating a revised version of the
>> patch. With the second patch, the gcc.misc-test/outputs.exp results
>> are clean on AIX.
>>
>
> Many thanks for confirming that the patch works.
>
> Is
On 1/8/21 8:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Hi, Bernd
>
> Thanks for investigating this and creating a revised version of the
> patch. With the second patch, the gcc.misc-test/outputs.exp results
> are clean on AIX.
>
Many thanks for confirming that the patch works.
Is it OK to push?
Thanks
Be
Hi, Bernd
Thanks for investigating this and creating a revised version of the
patch. With the second patch, the gcc.misc-test/outputs.exp results
are clean on AIX.
Thanks, David
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:59 PM Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> On 1/8/21 3:23 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 7,
On 1/8/21 3:23 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:18 PM Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/7/21 5:12 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> The unsetenv needs to be wrapped in
>>>
>>> if [info exists env(MAKEFLAGS)] {
>>>
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>> @@ -163,6 +167,9 @@ proc outest { test
