Re: [PATCH v2 04/N] Simplify usage of some TDF_* flags.

2017-05-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi Richi. > > That's a small reminder. I CCed Steven, but I guess if the TDF_COMMENT would > be really > important, it can be eventually added back. > > May I install the patch now? Ok. Richard. > Thanks, > Martin

Re: [PATCH v2 04/N] Simplify usage of some TDF_* flags.

2017-05-24 Thread Martin Liška
Hi Richi. That's a small reminder. I CCed Steven, but I guess if the TDF_COMMENT would be really important, it can be eventually added back. May I install the patch now? Thanks, Martin

Re: [PATCH v2 04/N] Simplify usage of some TDF_* flags.

2017-05-18 Thread Martin Liška
On 05/17/2017 02:36 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >> There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have >> very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because >> nobody is using them for scanning. >> >> Patch can bootstrap

Re: [PATCH v2 04/N] Simplify usage of some TDF_* flags.

2017-05-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have > very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because > nobody is using them for scanning. > > Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests

[PATCH v2 04/N] Simplify usage of some TDF_* flags.

2017-05-16 Thread Martin Liška
There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because nobody is using them for scanning. Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Martin >From d75cc6896b1041042c4aea31