On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:37:32PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2023, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 12:43:21PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > >
> > > > This adds rudimentary lifetime
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 12:43:21PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > > This adds rudimentary lifetime tracking in C++ constexpr contexts,
> > > allowing the compiler to report errors
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 12:43:21PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > This adds rudimentary lifetime tracking in C++ constexpr contexts,
> > allowing the compiler to report errors with using values after their
> > backing has gone out
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This adds rudimentary lifetime tracking in C++ constexpr contexts,
> allowing the compiler to report errors with using values after their
> backing has gone out of scope. We don't yet handle other ways of ending
> lifetimes (e.g.
This adds rudimentary lifetime tracking in C++ constexpr contexts,
allowing the compiler to report errors with using values after their
backing has gone out of scope. We don't yet handle other ways of ending
lifetimes (e.g. explicit destructor calls).
PR c++/96630
PR c++/98675
