Re: [PATCH v3, Fortran] TS 29113 testsuite

2021-09-03 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 9/3/21 3:14 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: If I read https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Floating-Types.html correctly, we should use _Float128 for the following errors "The _Float128 type is supported on all systems where __float128 is supported or where long double has the IEEE binary128

Re: [PATCH v3, Fortran] TS 29113 testsuite

2021-09-03 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, On 03.09.21 09:46, Christophe Lyon wrote: I'm not quite sure I understand the expected status of this patch: are all the "expected" failures tagged as XFAIL? I think that's the idea. If yes, then there's a problem because I see lots of unresolved on aarch64/arm XFAIL:

Re: [PATCH v3, Fortran] TS 29113 testsuite

2021-09-03 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
Hi, On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 7:29 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 7/27/21 5:07 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > Hi Sandra, hi Thomas, hi all, > > > > @Thomas K: Comments about the following - and of course to the > > testsuite itself - are highly welcome. > > > > In my opinion, the testsuite LGTM

Re: [PATCH v3, Fortran] TS 29113 testsuite

2021-08-19 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 7/27/21 5:07 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi Sandra, hi Thomas, hi all, @Thomas K: Comments about the following - and of course to the testsuite itself - are highly welcome. In my opinion, the testsuite LGTM and can be committed. @Sandra: - Thoughts on the directory name? (cf. below) - Give