On 7/27/20 12:25 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
So I don't think there's a different value that parse_and_check_align_values
could sensibly insert instead of zero.
All right, works for me.
Martin
> > This patch makes the -falign-foo=0 work as described in the
> > documentation. Thanks for all the suggestions, Richard and Segher!
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm the author of the original code.
>
> >
> > v3: make change more readable and self-consistent
> > v2: at a high level handles -falign-foo=0 lik
Martin Liška writes:
> On 7/27/20 9:46 AM, Hu Jiangping wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This patch makes the -falign-foo=0 work as described in the
>> documentation. Thanks for all the suggestions, Richard and Segher!
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm the author of the original code.
>
>>
>> v3: make change more readable
On 7/27/20 9:46 AM, Hu Jiangping wrote:
Hi!
This patch makes the -falign-foo=0 work as described in the
documentation. Thanks for all the suggestions, Richard and Segher!
Hello.
I'm the author of the original code.
v3: make change more readable and self-consistent
v2: at a high level handl
Hu Jiangping writes:
> Hi!
>
> This patch makes the -falign-foo=0 work as described in the
> documentation. Thanks for all the suggestions, Richard and Segher!
>
> v3: make change more readable and self-consistent
> v2: at a high level handles -falign-foo=0 like -falign-foo
Thanks, this is OK wit
Tested on x86_64.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Hu
> Jiangping
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:46 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; richard.sandif...@arm.com;
> seg...@kernel.crashing.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3] driver: fix a problem with impl
Hi!
This patch makes the -falign-foo=0 work as described in the
documentation. Thanks for all the suggestions, Richard and Segher!
v3: make change more readable and self-consistent
v2: at a high level handles -falign-foo=0 like -falign-foo
Regards!
Hujp
---
gcc/opts.c | 24 +++-
