Hi!
>From some discussion today, I think we want to limit the scope of
this patch to just the power8-fusion flag that's causing trouble for
now, given stage 4. We've talked about making power8-fusion a do-
nothing flag, since it doesn't add much benefit now and probably
shouldn't be a separate
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the comments!
on 2022/2/7 下午3:53, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
>> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
>>
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
> rs6000_can_inline_p simply makes it inlinable if callee_tree is
> NULL, but it's unexpected, we should
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/587635.html
BR,
Kewen
>> on 2022/1/5 下午3:34, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
>>> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/587635.html
BR,
Kewen
>
> on 2022/1/5 下午3:34, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
>> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/587635.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2022/1/5 下午3:34, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
>
Hi,
This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
rs6000_can_inline_p simply makes it inlinable if callee_tree is
NULL, but it's unexpected, we should use the command line options
from target_option_default_node as
