This patchset aims to make the RISCV atomics implementation stronger than the recommended mapping present in table A.6 of the ISA manual. https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/c7cf84547b3aefacab5463add1734c1602b67a49/src/memory.tex#L1083-L1157
The current mapping in GCC is not internally consistent. Andrea Parri pointed this out here along with a litmus test: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/Y1GbJuhcBFpPGJQ0@andrea/ As a result, we have an opportunity to jump straight to the A.6 implementation (meaning we will be compatible with LLVM's mappings which are A.6). In light of a proposal by Hans Boehm and to avoid an ABI break in the future, the mapping implemented is strictly stronger than the one in table A.6 in order to be compatible with Table A.7. https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-unprivileged/topic/risc_v_memory_model_topics/92916241 If Hans' proposal is accepted, it makes sense to migrate to the mapping recommended by table A.7. Since the stronger mapping in this patchset (provided by Hans Boehm) appears to be compatible with both A.6 and A.7, this transition should not result in an ABI break for GCC. Patch 1 simplifies the memmodel to ignore MEMMODEL_SYNC_* cases (legacy cases that aren't handled differently for RISC-V). Patches 2-5 make the mappings strictly stronger. Patches 5-9 weaken the mappings to be in line with table A.6 of the ISA manual. Patch 10 adds some basic conformance tests to ensure the implemented mapping matches table A.6 with stronger SEQ_CST stores. Christoph Muellner also submitted a similar patchset here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595712.html I used my previous patchset as a starting point since it was easier for me. LLVM mapping notes: * LLVM emits corresponding fences for atomic_signal_fence instructions. This seems to be an oversight since AFAIK atomic_signal_fence acts as a compiler directive. GCC does not emit any fences for atomic_signal_fence instructions. Patchset v1: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-April/592950.html Patchset v2: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/615264.html Changes for v2: * Use memmodel_base rather than a custom simplify_memmodel function (Inspired by Christoph Muellner's patch 1/9) * Move instruction styling change from [v1 5/7] to [v2 3/8] to reduce [v2 6/8]'s complexity * Eliminated %K flag for atomic store introduced in v1 in favor of if/else * Rebase/test Changes for v3: * Use a trailing fence for atomic stores to be compatible with Table A.7 * Emit an optimized fence r,rw following a SEQ_CST load * Consolidate tests in [PATCH v3 10/10] * Add tests for basic A.6 conformance Patrick O'Neill (10): RISCV: Eliminate SYNC memory models RISCV: Enforce Libatomic LR/SC SEQ_CST RISCV: Enforce atomic compare_exchange SEQ_CST RISCV: Add AMO release bits RISCV: Strengthen atomic stores RISCV: Eliminate AMO op fences RISCV: Weaken compare_exchange LR/SC pairs RISCV: Weaken mem_thread_fence RISCV: Weaken atomic loads RISCV: Table A.6 conformance tests gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h | 3 + gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 66 +++++++++++--- gcc/config/riscv/sync.md | 89 ++++++++++++++++--- .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-1.c | 8 ++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-2.c | 8 ++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-3.c | 8 ++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-4.c | 8 ++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-5.c | 8 ++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-1.c | 12 +++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-2.c | 12 +++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-3.c | 12 +++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-4.c | 12 +++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-5.c | 12 +++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-1.c | 9 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-2.c | 7 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-3.c | 7 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-4.c | 7 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-5.c | 7 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-1.c | 9 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-2.c | 10 +++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-3.c | 10 +++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-1.c | 9 ++ .../gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-2.c | 10 +++ .../riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-compat-3.c | 10 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr89835.c | 9 ++ libgcc/config/riscv/atomic.c | 4 +- 26 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-4.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-amo-add-5.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-4.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-compare-exchange-5.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-4.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-fence-5.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-load-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo-table-a-6-store-compat-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr89835.c -- 2.25.1
