On 6/11/24 23:53, Andi Kleen wrote:
Sorry I must have misunderstood you. I thought the patch was already
approved earlier and I did commit. I can revert or do additional
changes.
I only meant to approve the refactoring patch, but no worries.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 04:31:30PM -0400, Jason Me
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 20:53 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > -Some assemblers allow semicolons as a line separator. However,
> > > -note that some assembler dialects use semicolons to start a comment.
> > > +Some assemblers allow semicolons as a line separator. However,
> > > +note that some assemble
Hi Jason,
Sorry I must have misunderstood you. I thought the patch was already
approved earlier and I did commit. I can revert or do additional
changes.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 04:31:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > + if (tok->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
> > +{
> > + matching_parens p
On 6/5/24 00:45, Andi Kleen wrote:
Some programing styles use a lot of inline assembler, and it is common
to use very complex preprocessor macros to generate the assembler
strings for the asm statements. In C++ there would be a typesafe alternative
using templates and constexpr to generate the as
Some programing styles use a lot of inline assembler, and it is common
to use very complex preprocessor macros to generate the assembler
strings for the asm statements. In C++ there would be a typesafe alternative
using templates and constexpr to generate the assembler strings, but
unfortunately th
