On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 15:29:57 -0400
Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/6/21 14:28, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:32:26AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > No, I want q to point into the copy of the string, since I'm about
> > to modify it. And I'd prefer a single call
On 11/6/21 14:28, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:32:26AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 6 November 2021 01:21:43 CET, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Thanks, so like this? I'm including an incremental diff so that it's
clear what changed:
diff --git
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:32:26AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 6 November 2021 01:21:43 CET, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Thanks, so like this? I'm including an incremental diff so that it's
> >clear what changed:
> >
> >diff --git a/gcc/attribs.c
On 6 November 2021 01:21:43 CET, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>Thanks, so like this? I'm including an incremental diff so that it's
>clear what changed:
>
>diff --git a/gcc/attribs.c b/gcc/attribs.c
>index d5fba7f4bbb..addfe6f6c80 100644
>--- a/gcc/attribs.c
>+++ b/gcc/attribs.c
>@@
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 02:48:31PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/28/21 16:20, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:25:16PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 9/20/21 18:59, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > + handle_ignored_attributes_option ();
> > > > +
