Hi Segher,
Thanks for your comments.
在 2022/11/22 7:49, Segher Boessenkool 写道:
> *cbranch_2insn is not a machine insn. It generates a cror and a branch
> insn. This makes no sense to have in a cbranchcc: those do a branch
> based on an existing cr field, so based on the *output* of that cror.
Hi Haochen,
on 2022/11/22 13:12, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> 在 2022/11/22 11:11, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>> Maybe we can adjust prepare_cmp_insn to fail if the constructed cbranchcc4
>> pattern doesn't satisfy the predicate of operand 0 rather than to assert.
>> It's something like:
>>
>> if
Hi Kewen,
在 2022/11/22 11:11, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> Maybe we can adjust prepare_cmp_insn to fail if the constructed cbranchcc4
> pattern doesn't satisfy the predicate of operand 0 rather than to assert.
> It's something like:
>
> if (!insn_operand_matches (icode, 0, test))
> goto fail;
>
> or only
Hi Haochen,
Thanks for the explanation.
on 2022/11/21 14:18, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi Segher,
>
> 在 2022/11/18 20:18, Segher Boessenkool 写道:
>> I don't think we should pretend we have any conditional jumps the
>> machine does not actually have, in cbranchcc4. When would this ever be
>> useful?
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:18:39PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> 在 2022/11/18 20:18, Segher Boessenkool 写道:
> > I don't think we should pretend we have any conditional jumps the
> > machine does not actually have, in cbranchcc4. When would this ever be
> > useful? cror;beq can be quite
Hi Segher,
在 2022/11/18 20:18, Segher Boessenkool 写道:
> I don't think we should pretend we have any conditional jumps the
> machine does not actually have, in cbranchcc4. When would this ever be
> useful? cror;beq can be quite expensive, compared to the code it would
> replace anyway.
>
> If
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:20 AM Segher Boessenkool <
seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:35:30PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> > 在 2022/11/17 21:24, David Edelsohn 写道:
> > > Why are you using zero_constant predicate instead of matching
> (const_int 0) for operand 2?
> >
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:35:30PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> 在 2022/11/17 21:24, David Edelsohn 写道:
> > Why are you using zero_constant predicate instead of matching (const_int 0)
> > for operand 2?
> The "const_int 0" is an operand other than a predicate. We need a predicate
> here.
Said
Hi David,
在 2022/11/17 21:24, David Edelsohn 写道:
> This is better, but the pattern should be near and after the existing
> cbranch4 patterns earlier in the file, not the *cbranch pattern. It
> doesn't match the comment.
Sure, I will put it after existing "cbranch4" patterns.
>
> Why are you
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:39 AM HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> The patch enables have_cbrnachcc4 which is a flag in ifcvt.cc to
> indicate if branch by CC bits is invalid or not. The new expand pattern
> "cbranchcc4" is created which intend to match the pattern defined in
> "*cbranch",
Hi,
The patch enables have_cbrnachcc4 which is a flag in ifcvt.cc to
indicate if branch by CC bits is invalid or not. The new expand pattern
"cbranchcc4" is created which intend to match the pattern defined in
"*cbranch", "*cbranch_2insn" and "*creturn". The operand sequence in
"cbranchcc4" is
11 matches
Mail list logo
