Re: [PING][PATCH] RISC-V: Standardize formatting of SFB ALU conditional move

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Kito Cheng wrote: > OK, thanks for tweaking this! Committed now, thanks for your review! Would you mind sharing your opinion on my previous observation here: ? I have since realised we have a

Re: [PING][PATCH] RISC-V: Standardize formatting of SFB ALU conditional move

OK, thanks for tweaking this! On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:40 PM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Standardize the formatting of SFB ALU conditional move operations from: > > > > beq a2,zero,1f; mv a0,zero; 1: # movcc > > > > to: > > > >

[PING][PATCH] RISC-V: Standardize formatting of SFB ALU conditional move

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Standardize the formatting of SFB ALU conditional move operations from: > > beq a2,zero,1f; mv a0,zero; 1: # movcc > > to: > > beq a2,zero,1f # movcc > mv a0,zero > 1: > > for consistency with other assembly code