Re: [PING][PATCH 0/3] GNAT test suite fixes for build sysroot

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > Technically both variants of the expression achieve the same effect here > > as there is no problem with evaluating both sides of the OR operation in > > all cases, but your suggestion might help the readers avoid scratching > > their heads. > >

Re: [PING][PATCH 0/3] GNAT test suite fixes for build sysroot

> > Have you resolved your copyright assignment issues since then? > > The ball is now in FSF's court I'm told. OK > > The above patch needs to use "or else" instead of "or". OK with this change > > on the above patch. > > OK, I have updated that in my patch. > > Technically both variants

Re: [PING][PATCH 0/3] GNAT test suite fixes for build sysroot

On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > Ping for: > > > > > > Have you resolved your copyright assignment issues since then? The ball is now in FSF's court I'm told. > The above patch needs to use "or else" instead of "or".

Re: [PING][PATCH 0/3] GNAT test suite fixes for build sysroot

> > In the course of setting up GCC regression testing for the RISC-V target > > I have discovered that the GNAT test suite does not correctly respond to > > the test environment settings passed from the test harness in my setup and > > consequently no test case works correctly. > > Ping

[PING][PATCH 0/3] GNAT test suite fixes for build sysroot

On Tue, 14 May 2019, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > In the course of setting up GCC regression testing for the RISC-V target > I have discovered that the GNAT test suite does not correctly respond to > the test environment settings passed from the test harness in my setup and > consequently no