Re: [PING] [PATCH][RFA][PR middle-end/59285] Handle BARRIERS between blocks in rtl_merge_blocks

2013-12-10 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/10/13 16:22, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Jeff Law wrote: Ping! I'd prefer going with the first patch to merge_if_blocks (with a big "???" or FIXME), to contain this problem to where it occurs. Otherwise, before you know it, there are other places in the comp

Re: [PING] [PATCH][RFA][PR middle-end/59285] Handle BARRIERS between blocks in rtl_merge_blocks

2013-12-10 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > > > Ping! I'd prefer going with the first patch to merge_if_blocks (with a big "???" or FIXME), to contain this problem to where it occurs. Otherwise, before you know it, there are other places in the compiler that assume it's OK to merge blocks t

[PING] [PATCH][RFA][PR middle-end/59285] Handle BARRIERS between blocks in rtl_merge_blocks

2013-12-09 Thread Jeff Law
Ping! Original Message Subject: [PATCH][RFA][PR middle-end/59285] Handle BARRIERS between blocks in rtl_merge_blocks Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:52:33 -0700 From: Jeff Law To: gcc-patches builtin-unreachable-6.c when compiled for armv7l has a conditional where the fall-thr