Hi Jeff,
to my understanding a leaf function is characterized by not calling another
function in its function
body. So for the patch the question is whether we consider the mcount call
belonging to the function
body or not. As I see it from the backends for all uses of is_leaf the function
body
On 16/10/13 22:25, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/11/13 11:23, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount befo
On 10/11/13 11:23, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.h
On 10/10/13 18:41, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.h
On 10/10/13 04:00, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
I don't think this is necessarily correct for
On 09/10/13 21:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> [RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
> I don't think this is necessarily correct for all targets. ISTM the
> ability to
On 08/21/13 03:21, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
I don't think this is necessarily correct for all targets. ISTM the
ability to consider a function calling mcount as a leaf
On 02/10/13 09:10, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
>> Behalf Of Andreas Krebbel
>> Sent: 01 October 2013 10:18
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Andreas Krebbel
> Sent: 01 October 2013 10:18
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PING] 3 patches waiting for approval/review
>
> [RFC] Allow
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
[PATCH] PR57377: Fix mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01364.html
[PATCH] Doc: Add documentation for the mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gn
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
[PATCH] PR57377: Fix mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01364.html
[PATCH] Doc: Add documentation for the mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gn
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
[PATCH] PR57377: Fix mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01364.html
[PATCH] Doc: Add documentation for the mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gn
[RFC] Allow functions calling mcount before prologue to be leaf functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00993.html
[PATCH] PR57377: Fix mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01364.html
[PATCH] Doc: Add documentation for the mnemonic attribute
http://gcc.gn
14 matches
Mail list logo
