Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-10-10 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/10/18 6:35 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 10 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> On 10/10/2018 13:17, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > I see, I guess the easiest is to skip the

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-10-10 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 14:35, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 10 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On 10/10/2018 13:17, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: > >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > >>> > I see, I guess the

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-10-10 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Oct 10 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 10/10/2018 13:17, Martin Jambor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> I see, I guess the easiest is to skip the test on targets that do not really have long

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-10-10 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 10/10/2018 13:17, Martin Jambor wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: I see, I guess the easiest is to skip the test on targets that do not really have long double, although if someone thinks that is too restrictive, I can also split

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-10-10 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> I see, I guess the easiest is to skip the test on targets that do not >> really have long double, although if someone thinks that is too >> restrictive, I can also split the test again and move long

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-28 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 20:48, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 17:26, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 17:50, Martin Jambor wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 24 2018, Christophe

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-27 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 17:26, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 17:50, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 24 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 20:46, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> >>

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-26 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Martin Jambor wrote: > I see, I guess the easiest is to skip the test on targets that do not > really have long double, although if someone thinks that is too > restrictive, I can also split the test again and move long double bits > to a separate test. You should be able to

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-26 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Sep 26 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 17:50, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Sep 24 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 20:46, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> the test added to check whether _Float128 types

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-26 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 17:50, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 24 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 20:46, Martin Jambor wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by > >> the new warning about suspicious

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/24/18 12:45 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by > the new warning about suspicious calls to abs-like functions fails on > many platforms. The patch below circumvents the problem by running on > i686/x86_64 only. I

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-25 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Mon, Sep 24 2018, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 20:46, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by >> the new warning about suspicious calls to abs-like functions fails on >> many platforms. The patch

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-24 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 20:46, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by > the new warning about suspicious calls to abs-like functions fails on > many platforms. The patch below circumvents the problem by running on > i686/x86_64

Re: [PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-24 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by > the new warning about suspicious calls to abs-like functions fails on > many platforms. The patch below circumvents the problem by running on > i686/x86_64 only. I

[PR 87339, testsuite] Fix failure of gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c on some targets

2018-09-24 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, the test added to check whether _Float128 types are handled correctly by the new warning about suspicious calls to abs-like functions fails on many platforms. The patch below circumvents the problem by running on i686/x86_64 only. I understand that the proper solution would be to come up