On 4/16/20 6:50 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Iain Sandoe wrote:
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
My fix for 94147 was confusing no-linkage with internal linkage, at the
language level. That's wrong. (the std is confusing here, because it describes
linkage of names (which is wrong), and
Hi Nathan,
Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
>> My fix for 94147 was confusing no-linkage with internal linkage, at the
>> language level. That's wrong. (the std is confusing here, because it
>> describes linkage of names (which is wrong), and lambdas have no names)
>>
>>
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> My fix for 94147 was confusing no-linkage with internal linkage, at the
> language level. That's wrong. (the std is confusing here, because it
> describes linkage of names (which is wrong), and lambdas have no names)
>
> Lambdas with extra-scope, have
My fix for 94147 was confusing no-linkage with internal linkage, at the
language level. That's wrong. (the std is confusing here, because it
describes linkage of names (which is wrong), and lambdas have no names)
Lambdas with extra-scope, have linkage. However, at the
implementation-level
