On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ok. Note that I think emit_block_move shouldn't mess with the addressable
> flag.
I have successfully tested a patch that stops it from doing so,
reverting https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429#c11 but
according to bugs 49429 and 49454, it
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Ok. Note that I think emit_block_move shouldn't mess with the addressable
>> flag.
>
> I have successfully tested a patch that stops it from doing so,
> reverting https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
On Oct 12, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> Ok. Note that I think emit_block_move shouldn't mess with the addressable
>>> flag.
>>
>> I have successfully tested a patch that stops it from d
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
Ok. Note that I think emit_block_move shouldn't mess with the addressable
flag
On Oct 14, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ok. Note that I think emit_block_
On 11/02/2015 06:11 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 14, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 12, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 9, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
Ok. Not
On Nov 3, 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 06:11 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct 14, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> It looks ok to me but lacks a comment in mark_addressable_1 why we
>>> do this queueing when currently expanding to RTL.
>>
+/* Mark X as addressable or queue it
Hi!
On 2015-11-03T02:29:41-0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Thanks, here's the patch as just installed.
> --- a/gcc/gimple-expr.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-expr.c
> +static void
> +mark_addressable_1 (tree x)
> +{
> + [...]
> +}
> +
> +/* Adaptor for mark_addressable_1 for use in hash_set traversal. *
On Oct 9, 2015, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> This fixes fallout from the PR64164 expander revamp.
> Uroš kindly tested with an alpha-linux-gnu regstrap.
The one regression he mentioned from that run was gcc.dg/pr43300.c. The
vector parameter there is handled by the emit_block_move case of
assign_
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2015, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>> This fixes fallout from the PR64164 expander revamp.
>
>> Uroš kindly tested with an alpha-linux-gnu regstrap.
>
> The one regression he mentioned from that run was gcc.dg/pr43300.c. The
> vecto
10 matches
Mail list logo