Hi Thomas,
Are there any further questions, or am I good to commit my patch as
posted?
Problem is, I have never looked into module writing / reading in any
detail, so it will take a few days for me to get up to speed so I can
really review your patch.
If, in the meantime, maybe somebody else
then this will be necessary
> anyway (several of these bits can then in fact appear).
Committed to trunk in r269854 "[testsuite, Fortran] Provide
'dg-compile-aux-modules' in 'gfortran.dg/goacc/goacc.exp'", r269855
"[PR72741] Encode OpenACC 'routine' directive's level of parallelis
Hi!
Are there any further questions, or am I good to commit my patch as
posted?
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:38:30 +0100, I wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:13:46 +0100, Thomas Koenig
> wrote:
> > Am 13.03.19 um 18:50 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> > >> There are many ways to deal with it without bumping
Hi Thomas!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:13:46 +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 13.03.19 um 18:50 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> >> There are many ways to deal with it without bumping MOD_VERSION in a
> >> backwards but not forwards compatible way, so that a newer compiler will be
> >> able to parse old
Am 13.03.19 um 18:50 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
There are many ways to deal with it without bumping MOD_VERSION in a
backwards but not forwards compatible way, so that a newer compiler will be
able to parse old *.mod files, and newer compiler new ones as long as this
problematic stuff doesn't
r effort will be recorded in the commit log, see
<https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Reviewed-by>.
Grüße
Thomas
>From b2f200d24d040c6d34b5b4421e4cb1be9786030f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:39:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [PR72741] Encode OpenACC 'routine
