Hi Harald,
here's my revised patch for the treatment of (2**e) ** n and (- 2**e) **
n, trying to take into account the bitwidth of the result.
I've also extended the testcase to sample different integer kinds.
ChangeLogs see below.
Note: I don't have commit rights, so please somebody else
I was too anxious pressing the send button so that I forgot to mention:
Regtested with no new regressions on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Sorry for that.
Harald
On 01/20/19 23:18, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> here's my revised patch for the treatment of (2**e) ** n and (- 2**e) **
> n, trying
Dear all,
here's my revised patch for the treatment of (2**e) ** n and (- 2**e) **
n, trying to take into account the bitwidth of the result.
I've also extended the testcase to sample different integer kinds.
ChangeLogs see below.
Note: I don't have commit rights, so please somebody else take
