This fixes the second testcase in the PR.
I've tested Andrew's patch and pushed it.
Aldy
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/97315
* range-op.cc (value_range_with_overflow): Change any
non-overflow calculation in which both bounds are
overflow/underflow to be undefined.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr97315-2.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/range-op.cc b/gcc/range-op.cc
index 87c6d82f2ac..22bc23c1bbf 100644
--- a/gcc/range-op.cc
+++ b/gcc/range-op.cc
@@ -287,6 +287,15 @@ value_range_with_overflow (irange &r, tree type,
}
else
{
+ // If both bounds either underflowed or overflowed, then the result
+ // is undefined.
+ if ((min_ovf == wi::OVF_OVERFLOW && max_ovf == wi::OVF_OVERFLOW)
+ || (min_ovf == wi::OVF_UNDERFLOW && max_ovf == wi::OVF_UNDERFLOW))
+ {
+ r.set_undefined ();
+ return;
+ }
+
// If overflow does not wrap, saturate to [MIN, MAX].
wide_int new_lb, new_ub;
if (min_ovf == wi::OVF_UNDERFLOW)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr97315-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr97315-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5dd1b6a3fc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr97315-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void c(int);
+
+int a;
+void b()
+{
+ if (a >= 2147483647)
+ c(a + 1);
+}