Hi Janus,
Janus Weil wrote:
Looking through the stashed patches, I realized a pending (unsubmitted)
patch, showing that both a test case for CO_REDUCE was missing and that
libcaf_single didn't include co_reduce.
This patch adds them.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
An early PING.
Last year, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Looking through the stashed patches, I realized a pending
(unsubmitted) patch, showing that both a test case for CO_REDUCE was
missing and that libcaf_single didn't include co_reduce.
This patch adds them.
Build and regtested on
Hi Tobias,
Looking through the stashed patches, I realized a pending (unsubmitted)
patch, showing that both a test case for CO_REDUCE was missing and that
libcaf_single didn't include co_reduce.
This patch adds them.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
looks rather
2015-01-02 17:24 GMT+01:00 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de:
Looking through the stashed patches, I realized a pending (unsubmitted)
patch, showing that both a test case for CO_REDUCE was missing and that
libcaf_single didn't include co_reduce.
This patch adds them.
Build and regtested on
Looking through the stashed patches, I realized a pending (unsubmitted)
patch, showing that both a test case for CO_REDUCE was missing and that
libcaf_single didn't include co_reduce.
This patch adds them.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
[Still to do for co_reduce:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_14.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_14.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000..f0ab932
--- /dev/null
+++
Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_14.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_14.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000..f0ab932
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_14.f90
FAIL:
This patch adds some more checks and the actual implementation (compiler
side and libcaf_single) for CO_REDUCE. It also rejects coindexed
variables elsewhere, in line with the recent J3 changes. I also updated
the API documentation (adding doc for collectives.)
Still unsupported as elsewhere