On Tuesday 04 October 2011 20:54:21 Janus Weil wrote:
> >>> The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
> >>
> >> The patch is basically OK.
> >
> > Otherwise I'll just start by committing the
> > patch as posted ...
>
> Just did so (r179520).
>
Hello,
I've just commit
>> If you have a cute idea how to elegantly introduce warnings into this
>> mechanism, I'm all ears.
> I'm not sure that it qualifies as cute, but we could produce multi-line
> diagnostics in the same way c++ does (for template candidates for example),
> like:
> error/warning: #the error/warning
>
On Tuesday 04 October 2011 19:01:50 Janus Weil wrote:
> If you have a cute idea how to elegantly introduce warnings into this
> mechanism, I'm all ears.
I'm not sure that it qualifies as cute, but we could produce multi-line
diagnostics in the same way c++ does (for template candidates for example
>>> The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>>>
>> The patch is basically OK.
> Otherwise I'll just start by committing the
> patch as posted ...
Just did so (r179520).
Cheers,
Janus
Hi Mikael,
>> here is a patch for a rather long-standing PR. It continues my ongoing
>> campaign of improving the checks for "procedure characteristics" (cf.
>> F08 chapter 12.3), which are relevant for dummy procedures, procedure
>> pointer assignments, overriding of type-bound procedures, etc.
>
On Monday 03 October 2011 23:02:15 Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a patch for a rather long-standing PR. It continues my ongoing
> campaign of improving the checks for "procedure characteristics" (cf.
> F08 chapter 12.3), which are relevant for dummy procedures, procedure
> pointer assign
Hi all,
here is a patch for a rather long-standing PR. It continues my ongoing
campaign of improving the checks for "procedure characteristics" (cf.
F08 chapter 12.3), which are relevant for dummy procedures, procedure
pointer assignments, overriding of type-bound procedures, etc.
This particular
