Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
This looks good to me
but I let Tobias have the final word as he
expressed some concerns in the PR audit trail.
Sorry for the very belated replay. I played with the patch and it looks
okay.
thanks. Committed as r202766.
Btw, since
Hi Janus, hi all,
On August 15, 2013, Janus Weil wrote:
Hi Mikael,
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
This looks good to me
but I let Tobias have the final word as he
expressed some concerns in the PR audit trail.
Sorry for the very belated replay. I played with the
Hi,
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
This looks good to me
but I let Tobias have the final word as he
expressed some concerns in the PR audit trail.
Sorry for the very belated replay. I played with the patch and it looks
okay.
thanks. Committed as r202766.
(Except
Hi Mikael,
here is a small regression-fix patch for a problem with procedure
pointers and the PURE attribute, for details see the PR. In essence:
gfc_compare_interfaces is asymmetric in the two interfaces it compares
(e.g. regarding the PURE attribute), and we must not symmetrize it by
Le 07/08/2013 16:02, Janus Weil a écrit :
Hi all,
here is a small regression-fix patch for a problem with procedure
pointers and the PURE attribute, for details see the PR. In essence:
gfc_compare_interfaces is asymmetric in the two interfaces it compares
(e.g. regarding the PURE
Le 07/08/2013 16:02, Janus Weil a écrit :
Hi all,
here is a small regression-fix patch for a problem with procedure
pointers and the PURE attribute, for details see the PR. In essence:
gfc_compare_interfaces is asymmetric in the two interfaces it compares
(e.g. regarding the PURE
Hi all,
here is a small regression-fix patch for a problem with procedure
pointers and the PURE attribute, for details see the PR. In essence:
gfc_compare_interfaces is asymmetric in the two interfaces it compares
(e.g. regarding the PURE attribute), and we must not symmetrize it by
calling it
