Hi Tobias,
I know about PRIF and was involved in the design of Caffeine. Unfortunately did
this intersect with the funding proposal and we did not want to overload the
proposal more. At the moment adding module support to dist. mem. coarrays means
OpenCoarrays patching, yes. In the unlikely
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
PS That's good news about the funding. Maybe we will get to see "built in"
coarrays soon?
You hopefully will see Nikolas work on the shared memory coarray support, if
that is what you mean by "built in" coarrays. I will be working on the
distributed memory coarray
Hi Paul,
thank you for the review. No need to apologize. I am happily working on and will
ping if I get no reviews.
Btw, Mikael, Nikolas and I are covered by the same funding and agreed to not
review each others work to prevent any "smells", like "they follow there own
agenda". We can of course
Hi Andre,
I apologise for the slow response. It's been something of a heavy week...
This is good for mainline.
Thanks
Paul
PS That's good news about the funding. Maybe we will get to see "built in"
coarrays soon?
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 11:25, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached
Hi all,
attached patch fixes a memory leak when a user-defined function returns a
polymorphic type/class. The issue was, that the polymorphic type was not
detected correctly and therefore the len-field was not transferred correctly.
Regtests ok x86_64-linux/Fedora 39. Ok for master?
Regards,
