Hi,
This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
called only for jumptable rodata for functions. This was true until
6.1, when a comm
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
called only for jumptable rodata for functions. This
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
called only for jumptable rodata for functions. This
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>
>> As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
>> c
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>>
>>> As described in the bugzilla
2016-06-16 10:27 GMT+03:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
:
>
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>
>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>
>>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
JUMP_TABLES
Denis Chertykov writes:
> 2016-06-16 10:27 GMT+03:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> :
>>
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>>
>>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>>
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SEC
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
called only for jumptable rodata for functions. This
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>
>> As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
>> c
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
[set JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1]
I added tests that use linker relaxation and discovered a relaxation bug
in binutils 2.26 (and later) that messes up symbol
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
>>
>>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>>
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> [set JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1]
>>>
>>> I added tests that use linker relaxation and discovered a r
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
Hi,
[set JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1]
I added tests that use linker relaxation and discovered a relaxat
On Jun 23, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Maybe even check during configure whether an appropriate version of
> Binutils is used?
>> That would be nice, but is it ok to add target specific conditions to
>> configure.ac?
>
> We already have avr-specific tests in gcc/configure
13 matches
Mail list logo