On 11/11/19 2:58 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Unfortunately ISO_Fortran_binding_16.f90 contains a typo resulting in:
the cause is that it refers to ISO_Fortran_binding_15.c instead of
ISO_Fortran_binding_16.c in the dg-additional-sources directive.
I was sure that I tested it and committed the r
Unfortunately ISO_Fortran_binding_16.f90 contains a typo resulting in:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_16.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_16.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_16.f90 -O2 (test for excess err
Hi José,
On 10/29/19 11:35 AM, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote:
Added the suggested check and a few touches to comments and the error
message.
Thanks.
that might be a bug in the C code of the test itself
I took a look and although there are problems with the code of the
test I do not think t
Hi,
On 17/10/19 17:29, Tobias Burnus wrote:
If you generate to stdout/stderr like in this case, I think it makes
sense to also check for this output using "{dg-output …}".
Added the suggested check and a few touches to comments and the error
message.
that might be a bug in the C
code of
I will deal with this and various other issues associated with
ISO_Fortran_binding tomorrow.
Thanks for your help
Paul
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 18:30, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> + fprintf (stderr, "CFI_setpointer: Result is NULL.\n");
> …
> > + return CFI_INVALID_DESCRIPTOR;
> > +! { d
Hi,
+ fprintf (stderr, "CFI_setpointer: Result is NULL.\n");
…
+ return CFI_INVALID_DESCRIPTOR;
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-additional-options "-fbounds-check" }
+! { dg-additional-sources ISO_Fortran_binding_15.c }
If you generate to stdout/stderr like in this case, I think it makes
sense
Hi all!
Proposed patch to solve the handling of the attribute value in the
descriptor.
Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
CFI_setpointer does not check if it is setting a pointer and will set
any type of object to the target.
CFI_setpointer will also change the pointer attribute of
