171.swim fails on aarch64-linux as well. I dis a bisect and confirm it's r248877 causing
the miscompare.
Regards,
Renlin
On 06/06/17 12:05, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2017.06.05 at 22:39 +0200, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
With all the style fixes committed as r248877.
171_swim fails now. I did
On 2017.06.05 at 22:39 +0200, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
> With all the style fixes committed as r248877.
171_swim fails now. I didn't bisect, but I suspect your revision.
--
Markus
With all the style fixes committed as r248877.
Thanks for the review.
Nicolas
On 06/03/2017 06:25 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
On 06/03/2017 06:48 AM, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
Hello everyone,
here is a version of the patch that includes a workaround for PR 80960. I have
also included a separate te
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 09:25:31AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 06/03/2017 06:48 AM, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > here is a version of the patch that includes a workaround for PR 80960. I
> > have
> > also included a separate test case for the failure that Dominique detec
On 06/03/2017 06:48 AM, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> here is a version of the patch that includes a workaround for PR 80960. I have
> also included a separate test case for the failure that Dominique detected.
> The
> style issues should be fixed.
>
> Regression-tested. OK for tru
Hello everyone,
here is a version of the patch that includes a workaround for PR 80960.
I have also included a separate test case for the failure that Dominique
detected. The style issues should be fixed.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Nicolas
Changelog:
2017-06-03 Nicolas Koenig
> Le 1 juin 2017 à 16:19, Dominique d'Humières a écrit :
>
> I see
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90 -O1 execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90 -O2 execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops -f
> Le 1 juin 2017 à 11:30, Dominique d'Humières a écrit :
>
>
>> Le 31 mai 2017 à 21:03, Nicolas Koenig a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Dominique,
>>
>> attached is the next try, this time without stupidities (I hope). Both test
>> cases you posted don't ICE anymore.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>>
>> Nicola
> Le 31 mai 2017 à 21:03, Nicolas Koenig a écrit :
>
> Hello Dominique,
>
> attached is the next try, this time without stupidities (I hope). Both test
> cases you posted don't ICE anymore.
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> Nicolas
>
Preliminary tests look OK, full testing in progress.
Thanks,
Domin
On 31 May 2017 at 21:03, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
> Hello Dominique,
>
> attached is the next try, this time without stupidities (I hope). Both test
> cases you posted don't ICE anymore.
>
> Ok for trunk?
Please check contrib/check_GNU_style.sh /tmp/p8.diff
and let me point you to contrib/vimrc
Fur
Hello Dominique,
attached is the next try, this time without stupidities (I hope). Both
test cases you posted don't ICE anymore.
Ok for trunk?
Nicolas
Regression tested for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Changelog (still the same):
2017-05-27 Nicolas Koenig
PR fortran/35339
* fron
> Le 31 mai 2017 à 17:40, Dominique d'Humières a écrit :
>
> If I am not mistaken, compiling the following code with the patch applied
simpler test
print *,(huge(0),i=1,6)
! print*,(i,i=1,6)
! print*,(i,i=1,6,1)
end
>
> gives an ICE.
>
> TIA
>
> Dominique
If I am not mistaken, compiling the following code with the patch applied
program test_ivs
use iso_varying_string
implicit none
type(varying_string),dimension(:,:),allocatable :: array2d
type(varying_string) :: extra
integer :: i,j
allocate(array2d(2,3))
extra = "four"
array2d(
On 29 May 2017 17:49:30 CEST, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
>Hello Dominique,
>
>mea culpa, their was a bit confusion with the file being open in emacs
>and vi at the same time. Attached is the new patch with the #define
>removed.
+static int
+simplify_io_impl_do (gfc_code **code, int *walk_subtrees,
+
> Le 29 mai 2017 à 17:49, Nicolas Koenig a écrit :
>
> Hello Dominique,
>
> mea culpa, their was a bit confusion with the file being open in emacs
> and vi at the same time. Attached is the new patch with the #define removed.
>
> Nicolas
>
Thanks for the quick fix!
Testing in progress
Domi
Hello Dominique,
mea culpa, their was a bit confusion with the file being open in emacs
and vi at the same time. Attached is the new patch with the #define removed.
Nicolas
On 05/29/2017 05:32 PM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Updating gfortran with your patch fails with
../../wor
Hi Nicolas,
Updating gfortran with your patch fails with
../../work/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c: In function 'bool
traverse_io_block(gfc_code*, bool*, gfc_code*)':
../../work/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c:1067:20: error: expected
unqualified-id before '(' token
#define swap(x, y) (x) ^= (y),
On 05/27/2017 12:49 PM, Nicolas Koenig wrote:
Hello everyone,
attached is a patch to simplify implied do loops in io statements by replacing
them with their respective array slices. For example "WRITE (*,*) (a(i),
i=1,4,2)" becomes "WRITE (*,*) a(1:4:2)".
Ok for trunk?
Thanks for patch. C
Hello everyone,
attached is a patch to simplify implied do loops in io statements by
replacing them with their respective array slices. For example "WRITE
(*,*) (a(i), i=1,4,2)" becomes "WRITE (*,*) a(1:4:2)".
Ok for trunk?
Nicolas
Regression tested for x85_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Changelog:
2017
19 matches
Mail list logo
