Re: [Patch, fortran] PR81048 - [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

2017-10-13 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Good you caught the missing LF. Thanks! Paul On 13 October 2017 at 19:29, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: >> >> This patch undoes a side effect of r225447 that had the effect of >> eliminating the

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR81048 - [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

2017-10-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > This patch undoes a side effect of r225447 that had the effect of > eliminating the default intialization of derived type array results. > > The patch corrects the offending changes to the condition in resolve_symbol. > >

[Patch, fortran] PR81048 - [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

2017-10-13 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear All, This patch undoes a side effect of r225447 that had the effect of eliminating the default intialization of derived type array results. The patch corrects the offending changes to the condition in resolve_symbol. Bootstraps and regtests of FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk, 7- and 6-branches?