Thanks, Steve.
Fixed with revisions 273176, 7 & 8.
Paul
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 18:05, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 02:29:06PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > As anticipated, 8-branch required a different patch but the difference
> > was much smaller than anticipated.
> >
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 02:29:06PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> As anticipated, 8-branch required a different patch but the difference
> was much smaller than anticipated.
>
> Bootstrapped and regetested on FC29/x86_64 - OK for 8-branch?
>
OK for both patches.
--
Steve
As anticipated, 8-branch required a different patch but the difference
was much smaller than anticipated.
Bootstrapped and regetested on FC29/x86_64 - OK for 8-branch?
Paul
2019-07-06 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91077
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref) Delete code
that
This problem was caused by the code for scalarized array references to
subref arrays and deferred length variables not obtaining the correct
array descriptor and so getting the array span wrong. As it happens,
the lines, following the deleted part, correctly identify when the
info descriptor is a
