Re: [Patch, fortran] PR92976 - [8/9/10 Regression][OOP] ICE in trans_associate_var, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:1963

2020-03-01 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Committed to head as r10-6954-g957a1b14e99596610abb0777ca86a1c80dde24e0. Thanks, Thomas Paul On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 13:43, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > Regtested on x86_64/FC31 - OK for trunk and 8-/9- branches ? > > OK, and thanks for the patch. > > I think it makes sense to get

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR92976 - [8/9/10 Regression][OOP] ICE in trans_associate_var, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:1963

2020-03-01 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Paul, Regtested on x86_64/FC31 - OK for trunk and 8-/9- branches ? OK, and thanks for the patch. I think it makes sense to get this into gcc 9.3, which would need a backport before the 5th of March. Regards Thomas

[Patch, fortran] PR92976 - [8/9/10 Regression][OOP] ICE in trans_associate_var, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:1963

2020-02-29 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
I am a tiny bit skeptical that this is a regression but I will check. However, it has clearly been there from the early days of OOP without being picked up. The fix is to ensure that the temporary has the correct type of array spec. Regtested on x86_64/FC31 - OK for trunk and 8-/9- branches ?