Dear Dominique and Janne,
Putting the problem right turned out to be trivial. In the part of the
patch in gfc_conv_array_ref, what was being passed as 'decl' , in the
failing test from PR82617 was indeed an indirect reference. Applying
one dollop of indirection fixed it. The original testcase
Hi Dominique,
It's the patch for pr70752 that causes the trouble, which I had
guessed from the point in trans.c where the ICE occurs. I am onto it.
Thanks again
Paul
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 16:52, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
>
> > Is se->string_length guaranteed to be of type
Hi Dominique,
Thanks for the heads up - I will check it out and fix it next week
before doing any commits.
Cheers
Paul
On 26 September 2018 at 16:52, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
>> Is se->string_length guaranteed to be of type gfc_array_index_type_here?
>> If so, why? And if not, maybe a
> Is se->string_length guaranteed to be of type gfc_array_index_type_here?
> If so, why? And if not, maybe a fold_convert is in order?
I don’t know if this related, but if I build gfortran with the patches for PRs
70752 and 72709, 70149, and 65677 with --enable-checking=yes, compiling the
test
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:06 PM Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch is a bit more complicated than some of the previous posts.
> However, the ChangeLog explains the story pretty clearly.
>
> Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64 - OK for trunk and 8-branch?
>
This patch is a bit more complicated than some of the previous posts.
However, the ChangeLog explains the story pretty clearly.
Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64 - OK for trunk and 8-branch?
Again, better names for the testcases will be determined before committing.
Paul
2018-09-25 Paul
