On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:18:31PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:46:30PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00665.html
>
> Shouldn't dwarf2.exp just prepend that to options instead?
It does it if the test
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:46:30PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Ping.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00665.html
Shouldn't dwarf2.exp just prepend that to options instead?
If all tests in dwarf2/ directory are supposed to have it, then it just
should be done in one plac
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00665.html
Regards
Senthil
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:36:03PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds the new -gdwarf option to dg-options for testcases in
> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2 that don't already explicitly request DWARF.
Hi,
This patch adds the new -gdwarf option to dg-options for testcases in
gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2 that don't already explicitly request DWARF.
Not asking gcc to generate DWARF causes these tests to fail if gcc is
built/configured with support for multiple debugging formats and DWARF
is not the defaul
