On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:28:56PM +, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:49:08AM +, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:35:54PM +, Mike Stump wrote:
> > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > > > bind_pic_locally is broken for targets tha
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:49:08AM +, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:35:54PM +, Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > > bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> > > default [1][2].
> >
> > Let's give
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:35:54PM +, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> > bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> > default [1][2].
>
> Let's give Jakub 2 days to weigh in? If no objections, Ok, though, do see
> about a
On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> default [1][2].
Let's give Jakub 2 days to weigh in… If no objections, Ok, though, do see
about adding documentation for it. I kinda would like a simpler interface for
On Jan 7, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
>> Ping!
>
> ?
> We're confused, didn't someone say:
See, I was confused… I misread that… sorry.
On Jan 7, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> Ping!
?
We're confused, didn't someone say:
> Hi Vidya,
>
> > bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> > default [1][2].
> >
> > One of the suggestions was to have a effective target check called
> > bind_pic_
Ping!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:06:13PM +, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> default [1][2].
>
> One of the suggestions was to have a effective target check called
> bind_pic_locally_ok which checks if bind_pic_locall
Hi Vidya,
> bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
> default [1][2].
>
> One of the suggestions was to have a effective target check called
> bind_pic_locally_ok which checks if bind_pic_locally will work and have it
> included in all the tests that uses bind_pic_l
Hello,
bind_pic_locally is broken for targets that doesn't pass -fPIC/-fpic by
default [1][2].
One of the suggestions was to have a effective target check called
bind_pic_locally_ok which checks if bind_pic_locally will work and have it
included in all the tests that uses bind_pic_locally in dg-a
