Hi Tobias!
On 2022-07-07T11:36:34+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 07.07.22 10:42, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> In preparation for other changes:
> ...
>> On 2022-06-29T16:33:02+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>> +/* { dg-output "devices present but 'omp requires unified_address,
>>> unified_shared_mem
On 07.07.22 10:42, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
In preparation for other changes:
...
On 2022-06-29T16:33:02+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+/* { dg-output "devices present but 'omp requires unified_address,
unified_shared_memory, reverse_offload' cannot be fulfilled" } */
(The latter diagnostic late
Hi Thomas, hello all,
On 07.07.22 10:37, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
In preparation for other changes:
On 2022-06-29T16:33:02+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* { dg-do link { target offloading_enabled } } */
Not expected to s
Hi!
In preparation for other changes:
On 2022-06-29T16:33:02+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-4-aux.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } } */
> +
> +#pragma omp requires reverse_offload
> +
> +/* Note: The file doe
Hi!
In preparation for other changes:
On 2022-06-29T16:33:02+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3-aux.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } } */
> +
> +#pragma omp requires unified_address
> +
> +int x;
> +
> +void fo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:10:10PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > > + if (output_requires)
> > > +{
> > > + HOST_WIDE_INT val = ((HOST_WIDE_INT) omp_requires_mask
> > > + & (OMP_REQUIRES_UNIFIED_ADDRESS
> > > + | OMP_REQUIRES_UNIFIED_SHARED_
Hi Jakub,
On 29.06.22 19:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:33:02PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+ if (flag_openmp
+ && lookup_attribute ("omp declare target",
+ DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl)))
+omp_requires_mask
+ = (enum o
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:33:02PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> --- a/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
> +++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
> @@ -2488,6 +2488,12 @@ c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (c_parser *parser, bool
> fndef_ok,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (flag_openmp
> + && lookup_attribute ("omp
Hi Jakub, hi all,
new version attached. It now checks during lto1 whether the values are
consistent – and fails with a hard error.
The actually used value (by libgomp) is stored as a scalar weak symbol –
while for checking, each translation unit stores the integer value for
lto (alongside the of
