GCN: Restore lost '__gfx90a__' target CPU definition (was: [Patch] GCN: Add pre-initial support for gfx1100)

Hi! On 2024-01-07T20:20:19+0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > --- a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h > +++ b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ > builtin_define ("__CDNA2__"); \ >else if (TARGET_RDNA2) >

Re: [Patch] GCN: Add pre-initial support for gfx1100

ße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955 >From f9290cdf4697f467fd0fb7c710f58cc12e497889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2

Re: [Patch] GCN: Add pre-initial support for gfx1100

Hi Andrew, Andrew Stubbs wrote:    OK for mainline ? This looks fine to me. I know there will be things that need fixing for both experimental architectures. Indeed. I tried to be a bit more verbose also to avoid too high expectations by occasional gcc-patches@ readers. P.S. Apologies,

Re: [Patch] GCN: Add pre-initial support for gfx1100

On 07/01/2024 19:20, Tobias Burnus wrote: ROCm meanwhile supports also some consumer cards; besides the semi-new gfx1030, support for gfx1100 was added more recently (in ROCm 5.7.1 for "Ubuntu 22.04 only" and without parenthesis since ROCm 6.0.0). GCC has already very limited support for

[Patch] GCN: Add pre-initial support for gfx1100

ROCm meanwhile supports also some consumer cards; besides the semi-new gfx1030, support for gfx1100 was added more recently (in ROCm 5.7.1 for "Ubuntu 22.04 only" and without parenthesis since ROCm 6.0.0). GCC has already very limited support for gfx1030 - whose multlib support is - on