*ping* - Re: [Patch] Rework OpenACC nested reduction clause consistency checking (was: Re: [PATCH][committed] Warn about inconsistent OpenACC nested reduction clauses)

2020-01-08 Thread Harwath, Frederik
PING Hi Jakub, I have attached a version of the patch that has been rebased on the current trunk. Frederik On 03.12.19 12:16, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > On 08.11.19 07:41, Harwath, Frederik wrote: >> On 06.11.19 14:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> [...] >>> I'm not sure it is a good idea to use a

[Patch] Rework OpenACC nested reduction clause consistency checking (was: Re: [PATCH][committed] Warn about inconsistent OpenACC nested reduction clauses)

2019-12-03 Thread Harwath, Frederik
Hi Jakub, On 08.11.19 07:41, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > On 06.11.19 14:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > [...] >> I'm not sure it is a good idea to use a TREE_LIST in this case, vec would be >> more natural, wouldn't it. > > Yes. > > [...] >> If gimplifier is not the right spot, then use a splay tree