Hello,
* Tristan Gingold wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:20:19PM CEST:
> Ok for trunk ?
FWIW this looks good to me, and certainly necessary for Posix and
portable sed, but I can't approve it.
Thanks,
Ralf
> fixincludes/
> 2011-05-16 Tristan Gingold
>
> * inclhack.def (solaris_complex
On May 16, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Yes, it is ok on GNU/Linux and Solaris.
>>
>> Do I really need to test on HP/UX and AIX ? Won't be easy for me.
>
> Solaris and BSD are usually the most unusual, so I'd
Hi Tristan,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Yes, it is ok on GNU/Linux and Solaris.
>
> Do I really need to test on HP/UX and AIX ? Won't be easy for me.
Solaris and BSD are usually the most unusual, so I'd say go ahead for mainline
and see if you get squawks. With se
On May 16, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
>> the syntax should be:
>>
>> [2addr]c\
>> text
>>
>> (Note the trailin
Hi Tristan,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
> the syntax should be:
>
> [2addr]c\
> text
>
> (Note the trailing back-slash).
> But as currently written, there is no backslash in
Hi,
this rule (and only this one) uses the c function of sed. According to man,
the syntax should be:
[2addr]c\
text
(Note the trailing back-slash).
But as currently written, there is no backslash in it. As a consequence 'make
check' fails at least on Darwin (BSD derived sed
comman
