[Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-02-27 Thread Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches
This test is for LP64 only, exclude LLP64 too. Patch OK?From fbc83ae10df1a0e10c302fb0fee13092eb65818e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:49:31 + Subject: [PATCH] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64 gcc/testsuite/Cha

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-02-27 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
000 > Subject: [PATCH] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64 > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: Exclude from LLP64. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c | 4 ++-- >

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-02-27 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote: > This test is for LP64 only, exclude LLP64 too. > Patch OK? I may be confused, but you're not making use of the "llp64" effective target, there instead excluding/including lp64 / ilp32 in sets that not obviously mean "exclude LLP64".

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-02-28 Thread Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches
On 2/28/23 03:06, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote: This test is for LP64 only, exclude LLP64 too. Patch OK? I may be confused, but you're not making use of the "llp64" effective target, there instead excluding/including lp64 / ilp32 in sets

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-02-28 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong wrote: > On 2/28/23 03:06, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > This test is for LP64 only, exclude LLP64 too. > > > Patch OK? > > > > I may be confused, but you're not making use of the "llp64"

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-03-02 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches writes: > On 2/28/23 03:06, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote: >> >>> This test is for LP64 only, exclude LLP64 too. >>> Patch OK? >> >> I may be confused, but you're not making use of the "llp64" >> effective

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-03-02 Thread Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches
On 3/2/23 10:44, Richard Sandiford wrote: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c index 57c0f17bc91..ae588bd8491 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ const struct Ty

Re: [Patch] gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c: exclude from LLP64

2023-03-02 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> writes: > On 3/2/23 10:44, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c >>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c >>> index 57c0f17bc91..ae588bd8491 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-9.c >>> +++ b/gcc/testsu