On 10/06/16 13:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
> added in r237200.
>
> The iterators in this pattern do not resolve, as they have not been
> explicitly tied to the mode iterator (rather than the code iterator)
> used
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:29:39PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
> added in r237200.
>
> The iterators in this pattern do not resolve, as they have not been
> explicitly tied to the mode iterator (rather than the
On 17 June 2016 at 16:44, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 10 June 2016 at 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > My autotester picked up some issues with the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 10 June 2016 at 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
> > added in r237200.
> >
> Hi,
>
> What tests does your
On 10 June 2016 at 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
> added in r237200.
>
Hi,
What tests does your autotester perform? I haven't noticed these
problems when running the GCC testsuite on the
On 10/06/16 13:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
added in r237200.
The iterators in this pattern do not resolve, as they have not been
explicitly tied to the mode iterator (rather than the code iterator)
used by the pattern.
Hi,
My autotester picked up some issues with the vcvt{ds}_n_* intrinsics
added in r237200.
The iterators in this pattern do not resolve, as they have not been
explicitly tied to the mode iterator (rather than the code iterator)
used by the pattern.
This fixup adds the attribute tags, allowing