Hi,
In this testcase, all argument registers and the return register
will be general purpose registers:
long long
foo (long long a, long long b, long long c)
{
return ((a ^ b) & c) ^ b;
}
However, due to the implementation of aarch64_simd_bsl_internal
we'll match that pattern and em
[Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for the
new pattern I was adding. The change between this and the first version was:
+ [(set_attr "type" "neon_bsl,neon_bsl,neon_bsl,multiple")
+ (set_attr "length" "4,4,4,12")]
]
---
Hi,
In this testcase, all argument
*ping*
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:44:40PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> [Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for the
> new pattern I was adding. The change between this and the first version was:
>
> + [(set_attr "type" "neon_bsl,neon_bsl,neon
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:44:40PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> [Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for the
> new pattern I was adding. The change between this and the first version was:
>
> + [(set_attr "type" "neon_bsl,neon_bsl,neon_bsl,multiple")
> +
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:49:07AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> *ping*
*ping*x2
Thanks,
James
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:44:40PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > [Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for the
> > new pattern I was adding. The change between
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:49:01PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:44:40PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > [Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for the
> > new pattern I was adding. The change between this and the first version
> >
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:44:07PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:49:01PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:44:40PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > > [Sorry for the re-send. I spotted that the attributes were not right for
> > > th
